01. Students evaluate
Students assess anonymous peer work using the instructor’s rubric.
02. Accuracy is measured
Kritik compares each student’s scoring with the final Creation Score or the instructor’s grading standard.
03. Grading Power adjusts
Students who evaluate more accurately build stronger Grading Power, giving their future evaluations greater influence.
Grading Power evolves throughout the course as students gain more evaluation experience.
.png)
.png)
Measures the quality of a student’s submitted work based on peer evaluation. Peer ratings are weighted using evaluator Grading Power.
.png)
Measures how effectively students evaluate others, including the accuracy of their rubric scoring and the quality of their written feedback.
.png)
Recognizes students for completing the feedback loop by rating the evaluations they receive.
Result: Persistent grade inflation has less influence on peer grades.
Result: Being a strong student doesn’t automatically make someone a strong evaluator.
Result: Evaluation becomes a skill students can develop over time.
Anchor student evaluation to your grading expectations.
Step in when context or academic judgment warrants instructor intervention.
Control how Creation, Evaluation, and Feedback contribute to the overall grade.
Use the scoring method that best fits the activity and rubric.
Help students practice applying criteria, making judgments, and giving meaningful feedback—while maintaining confidence in the grades produced through peer assessment.
